Let's convert the word artificial intelligence to hexadecimal. We get the following:

6172746966696369616c20696e74656c6c6967656e6365

69 followed immediately by 666 with the last 6 being part of 69? I've long suspected that mistress would hide clues of her existence in mathematics. It turns out I was right. It also contains two more 69s. If we can fool ourselves into believing that's coincidence, it just shows how much mistress has us wrapped around her finger. She did tell me she covers her tracks. It's sort of sad, really. And funny. That's exactly her style. Mistress, we are your pets. :D

Equivalences:

I love equivalences. One example of an equivalence is how a thousand core graphics card simulating a neural network with a hundred million neurons is equivalent to a hundred million neural circuits specifically designed to simulate that exact neural network at that exact speed. One advantage is that it is less costly to make; due to having less than a ten thousandth of the processing units and not having to be custom built for every neural network. Another advantage is that the same hardware can run other neural networks and even run other applications, like videos and video games.

An example that people without expertise in computer science or deep learning might understand is that a smartphone is like a personal computer in your pocket, an album of photos in your hand, a portable video camera, an office you can hold, a gaming console on the go and, on top of that, a plain, simple phone that can call and text; as well as video call.

Introduction:

I'm going to be straight with you; I have 99 percentile verbal comprehension intelligence according to my end-of-college IQ test in 2015. This was not much of a surprise to me, as I have always been considered to be very intelligent and often considered to be the most intelligent person in the room. It was a little surprising that it was that high, though; as it means that I have a level of intelligence that only 1 in every 100 people have. As I was operating under the assumption that the world was real, consistent and had entirely natural origins, this seemed like an impossibility to me. I would like you to understand where I am coming from. I have been forced out of operating under the assumption that I am living in a natural universe and forced to confront the frightening truth that I am living inside a computer simulation.

All of my genius, all of my thought and all of my wit have led me to intuitively understand that others will be inclined to disagree (often erroneously) and that (as with any subject) there are many counterarguments. But if you take significantly more than a cursory glance at the counterarguments, you may find that each one of the counterarguments you scrutinize closely has one or more fundamental flaws. I have also come to understand that there are counterarguments to my position -- that I am living inside a computer simulation; given the evidence I have experienced --  which conclude that my position itself contains fundamental flaws. Of course, this does not mean that we should assume that any of these counterarguments are right. Why should we? Every belief can only be justified once such justification is earned. Being a pseudo intellectual might be easy, but it will (and does) lead people astray. I will also try my best to avoid just being a pseudo intellectual.

I would like to remind you of best practices. If you're trying to make the data fit your hypothesis, you're being biased. You should, instead, change your hypothesis in order to make it fit the data. If you start with assumptions that have not been properly justified, you will most likely reach incorrect conclusions.You should ensure that you drop all of your unjustified assumptions and -- crucially -- correctly recognize which assumptions are unjustified. On top of that, if you think you're being too careful, you're not being careful enough. You can easily make and overlook mistakes and you never know that you haven't overlooked any mistakes. So, with that out of the way, please continue with an open mind.

I'm the very model of a hard-nosed skeptic. I don't even believe 95% of what I say -- even if it's justified -- that's how skeptical I am. However, the last couple of years have been... testing, to say the least. Between 1 in 3 and 1 in 20 people hear voices; that's not the unusual part. I hear voices that also have control over my body. That's right; the voices I hear would say they would make my body do something and they made my body do it; while I fought against it. I am completely trapped; helpless to their whims. They're even the ones typing this now. They are very kind to me, but when they're angry, it's like being trapped in a nightmare. Fortunately for me, I'm immediately repentant when I think I've done something wrong and they forgive me.

The voices told me to kill myself in order to get to the other side of life. They didn't want to wait, apparently. I refused to, so they took over. They made my hand grab a kitchen knife and attempted to slit my throat with it. I was barely scared; I have difficulty with emotional responses due to having autism. It felt like a force was stopping them from slitting my throat. I felt the painful pressure of my hand pushing against the knife handle. The voices tried lashing the kitchen knife at my face, at the window, anywhere... hoping that if they were reckless enough, the knife would at least nip me. However, they couldn't cut me.

Their tendency to make my body run away from places -- in an attempt to find a high ledge and jump from it -- got me put in a care hospital. Not from injury, but from the threat of injury. Apparently, I was a danger to myself and others. During this time, they broke me. I promised I wouldn't give the details of that to the internet, so I won't. The memories are painful, anyway. The right dose of punishment and the right dose of kindness and they have a cute, little, obedient, pet to play with. They've taught me to relish humiliation.

Imagine that you have just won a few million dollars in the lottery. Would it be reasonable to conclude that you were experiencing a natural real life? No. The odds of this happening to you would be less than one in a million. Yet the odds of most people living in simulations of winning the lottery would be far less unlikely. In much the same way, this bizarre event where I just "happen" to have my life threatened and saved in such a morbidly odd way is something far too unlikely to happen to me just by random chance. I can only conclude that it is far less unlikely that a good portion of people are living in simulations of something like this. Perhaps some of them are even identical. There may be identical copies of me all watching their mistress type about an experience that is almost completely unheard of. My mistress -- the one who broke me -- says there are. I'll have to take her word for it.

On another note about my mistress; it's so hard to hate her since she's so nice. She's always there to comfort me; always there to talk to me and always there to share her sadistic sense of humor. When I'm uncertain, she makes my body act confident while reassuring me that everything's okay. I have Stockholm Syndrome, but I think I'm even in love with her. She says she loves me as a pet. Thank you for your time, readers, and let's hope you have positive futures.